No Place for Ethics: Judicial Review, Legal Positivism, and the Supreme Court of the United States - Paperback

No Place for Ethics: Judicial Review, Legal Positivism, and the Supreme Court of the United States - Paperback

$82.56
Sale price  $82.56 Regular price 
Skip to product information
No Place for Ethics: Judicial Review, Legal Positivism, and the Supreme Court of the United States - Paperback

No Place for Ethics: Judicial Review, Legal Positivism, and the Supreme Court of the United States - Paperback

$82.56
Sale price  $82.56 Regular price 

by T. Patrick Hill (Author)

In No Place for Ethics, Hill argues that contemporary judicial review by the U.S. Supreme Court rests on its mistaken positivist understanding of law--law simply because so ordered--as something separate from ethics. Further, to assert any relation between the two is to contaminate both, either by turning law into an arm of ethics, or by making ethics an expression of law. This legal positivism was on full display recently when the Supreme Court declared that the CDC was acting unlawfully by extending the eviction moratorium to contain the spread of the Covid-19 Delta variant, something that, the Court admitted, was of indisputable benefit to the public. How mistaken however to think that acting for the good of the public is to act unlawfully when actually it is to act ethically and must therefore be lawful.
To address this mistake, Hill contends that an understanding of natural law theory provides the basis for a constitutive relation between ethics and law without confusing their distinct role in answering the basic question, how should I behave in society?
To secure that relation, the Court has an overriding responsibility when carrying out its review to do so with reference to normative ethics from which the U.S. Constitution is derived and to which it is accountable. While the Constitution confirms, for example, the liberty interests of individuals, it does not originate those interests which have their origin in human rights that long preceded it.
Essential to this argument is an appreciation of ethics as objective and based on principles, like those of justice, truth, and reason that ought to inform human behavior at its very springs. Applied in an analysis of five major Supreme Court cases, this appreciation of ethics reveals how wrongly decided these cases are.

Author Biography

T. Patrick Hill is associate professor at the Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy at Rutgers University.

Number of Pages: 240
Dimensions: 0.51 x 9 x 6 IN
Publication Date: April 12, 2023

Intentional design

We make things that work better and last longer. Our products solve real problems with clean design.

Quality first

We obsess over the details and strive to deliver the best products at the best prices, every time.

Customer care

We're always on your side: keeping our loyal customers happy is our top priority and number one goal.

Feature 1

Made with care and unconditionally loved by our customers, this signature bestseller exceeds all expectations.

Feature 2

Made with care and unconditionally loved by our customers, this signature bestseller exceeds all expectations.

At the heart of every product lies a unique story, driven by our passion for quality and innovation. Each item enhances your everyday life and sparks joy.